News | Mammoth Water

Techstars Demo Day

Agricultural water is our collective lifeblood, growing our food, fuel, and fiber. And it’s increasingly at risk as a result […]

Read More

Getting your feet wet with markets

Greetings, fellow Mammoths. Richael here. I recently had the honor of being a guest on Nori’s Reversing Climate Change podcast. […]

Read More

Techstars Sustainability Accelerator

Mammoth Trading accepted into prestigious Techstars Sustainability Accelerator in Partnership with the Nature Conservancy Monday, July 29, 2019 Denver, CO—Mammoth […]

Read More

Report sheds light on complexities of agricultural water transfers

A new report co-produced by the Daugherty Water for Food Global Institute (DWFI) and Mammoth Trading offers insight into the […]

Read More

Groundwater trading for California

About the report Groundwater was the primary lifeline for Californians during the State’s recent drought. When surface water resources in rivers, […]

Read More

Young, R. & Brozović, N. (2019). Agricultural Water Transfers in the Western United States.

Environmental Defense Fund & Mammoth Trading. (2017). Groundwater Trading as a Tool for Implementing California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act.

Kuwayama, Y., Young, R., & Brozović, N. (2017). Groundwater Scarcity: Management Approaches and Recent Innovations. In Competition for Water Resources (pp. 332-350).

Young, R., & Brozović, N. (2016). Innovations in Groundwater Management: Smart Markets for Transferable Groundwater Extraction Rights. Technology and Innovation, 17, pp. 219-226.

Brozović, N., & Young, R. (2014). Design and implementation of markets for groundwater pumping rights. In Water Markets for the 21st Century, pp. 283-303. Springer Netherlands.

Palazzo, A., & Brozović, N. (2014). The role of groundwater trading in spatial water management. Agricultural Water Management, 145, pp. 50-60.

Kuwayama, Y., & Brozović, N. (2013). The regulation of a spatially heterogeneous externality: Tradable groundwater permits to protect streams. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66(2), pp. 364-382.